Backend Architecture Review

A structured written assessment of service boundaries, data flow, failure modes, and the API surface that glues them together.

Whiteboard session mapping system components

Who this is for

Engineering managers, principal engineers, and product-tech pairs who need an independent reading of a backend before committing budget to a rewrite, service split, or public API freeze.

What you receive

  • A written architecture brief (typically 8–15 pages) covering context, findings, risks, and prioritized recommendations
  • Annotated notes on the diagrams and OpenAPI (or equivalent) materials you supply
  • A 90-minute walkthrough call for the owning team
  • Optional follow-on office hours (quoted separately)

What is included

  • Review of architecture diagrams, repository maps, and runbooks you designate as in-scope
  • Up to four interviews (45 minutes each) with engineers or product partners you nominate
  • Assessment of service boundaries, coupling, data ownership, and failure propagation
  • API contract hygiene where it affects the architecture (naming, versioning, error models)
  • A ranked list of issues: must-address before launch, should-address next quarter, and park-for-later

What is excluded

  • Hands-on coding or pull-request delivery
  • Load testing or security penetration testing
  • Vendor selection sales pitches
  • Unlimited Slack availability during the review window

How we work

  1. Scoping call — confirm the decision this review must inform and the systems in bounds.
  2. Materials intake — you share diagrams, specs, and access notes under NDA if required.
  3. Reading & interviews — we examine the design and speak with the people who own the seams.
  4. Draft findings — you get a first pass for factual correction only.
  5. Final brief + walkthrough — recommendations locked for circulation inside your org.

Preparation

Useful inputs: a current system context diagram, a list of known pain points, sample API specs, and a named decision date. Incomplete materials slow the review more than imperfect diagrams do.

Constraints

We do not replace your architects. We pressure-test the design under the constraints you name — latency budgets, regulatory retention, team size, and release cadence. If the materials cannot support a responsible opinion, we say so early and pause billing for the unused portion.

Next step

Request a review inquiry with a short description of the system and the decision hanging on the findings. We reply within two business days with fit, timing, and an estimate.

Request this consultation